[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] frequency tuning word quantization
From: |
Eric Blossom |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] frequency tuning word quantization |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Mar 2006 16:58:27 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 10:32:05PM -0500, David I. Emery wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 05:53:44PM -0800, Eric Blossom wrote:
> >
> > In the FPGA, the phase word (not the accumulator) is approximately
> > 15-bits wide. This gives worst case phase-truncation spurs of -90 dBc.
> > This looks small enough that we can safely ignore it. Therefore,
> > I suggest we stop truncating the tuning word on the host side.
> >
> > Also, if we stop truncating on the host, then our frequency tuning
> > resolution will be 64e6 / 2**31 = 0.03 Hz. Probably fine enough for
> > most uses.
FYI,
The fix to remove the host-side truncation of the frequency tuning
word went in yesterday.
Eric
- [Discuss-gnuradio] am reception examples, Matteo Campanella, 2006/03/02
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] am reception examples, Eric Blossom, 2006/03/04
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] am reception examples, Matteo Campanella, 2006/03/05
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] frequency tuning word quantization, Eric Blossom, 2006/03/05
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] frequency tuning word quantization, Martin Dvh, 2006/03/05
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] frequency tuning word quantization, David I. Emery, 2006/03/05
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] frequency tuning word quantization, Eric Blossom, 2006/03/05
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] frequency tuning word quantization, David I. Emery, 2006/03/05
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] frequency tuning word quantization,
Eric Blossom <=
- Message not available
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] frequency tuning word quantization, Eric Blossom, 2006/03/08
- Message not available
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] frequency tuning word quantization, Eric Blossom, 2006/03/08
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] frequency tuning word quantization, Lamar Owen, 2006/03/09