discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] V3 Comments on "BBN's Proposed extensions for dat


From: Michael Dickens
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] V3 Comments on "BBN's Proposed extensions for data networking"
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 08:13:52 -0400

On Jun 15, 2006, at 2:03 AM, Eric Blossom wrote:
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 12:51:05AM -0400, David Lapsley wrote:
On 6/14/06 2:24 PM, "Michael Dickens" <address@hidden> wrote:


p68, 4.8.1; and p74, 4.8.4: How can an m-block have zero ports?  I
thought that all data / metadata / signals / whatever were
transported via these ports. Without a port of any type, what can an
m-block do?

Not much!  This is a bug.  I'll fix it.

Actually an m-block could have zero external ports with no problem.
In fact that's exactly what the top level m-block looks like ;)

OK, I'll bite. How does data get into or out of something with zero external ports? Via internal ports? So, e.g., a source could be made internal-only, and connect internally to other m-blocks, and eventually drop to an internal-only sink? Are there any advantages to setting up this way versus using a single m-block per signal- processing concept (source, processing, sink)? IMHO it would be helpful to have a quick example in the text, just to be (more) complete. - MLD




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]