Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] V3 Comments on "BBN's Proposed extensions for data networking"

[David Lapsley]

On 6/19/06 8:49 AM, "Michael Dickens" <address@hidden> wrote:

> Back after a weekend trip w/o internet access ...
> 
> On Jun 16, 2006, at 12:28 AM, David Lapsley wrote:
>> I agree.  This has been a really great discussion and has really
>> helped to
>> improve clarity and smooth some wrinkles in the document, but we
>> should
>> probably bring this phase to a close and start implementing. How
>> about if
>> I get this last set of comments into the document and then
>> declare that the final version?
> 
> Sounds good to me.  Please check for typos too; there were a few.

Great!  Will do.  I'm still working on it, but will have the "final" version
out this week.

> 
>> I will try to stick to the "less is more"
>> philosophy as I am editing.
> 
> Brevity is a virtue.  Too much brevity leads to confusion and
> "interpretation loss" ... sort of like channel capacity (via Shannon:
> one can achieve maximum channel throughput [maximum brevity] with an
> arbitrarily low data error rate, but any more brevity and there will
> be errors [data loss]). - MLD

I like the idea of applying Shannon's theorem to document editing.  Very
nice :-)

Cheers,

Dave.