[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] The coming deluge of CPU cycles
From: |
Daniel O'Connor |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] The coming deluge of CPU cycles |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Jul 2006 16:02:00 +0930 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.3 |
On Thursday 27 July 2006 15:39, Jason Hecker wrote:
> Would an extra bit of hardware such as a PCI card with PLX's PCI9030
> breaking out to the USRP with something like an 80 wire IDE cable be
> suitable for high bandwidth, low latency and lowish cost?
>
> (http://www.plxtech.com/products/io_accelerators/PCI9030/default.htm)
A 9030 is target only, you'd need a 9054, 9056, 9060 or 9080 otherwise the
performance would not be very great.
Another option is to use a PCI soft core but then you run into licensing
issues.
I have looked at these for work and one problem (for us anyway) is that the
S/G engine doesn't treat the data as precious so it's not very useful for
reading from a FIFO. It's quite frustrating because that means you have a
chip which has an S/G engine built in but you have to make your own anyway :(
I'd love to be shown to be wrong though ;)
> I know someone who used gigabit ethernet driver chips hooked to an FPGA
> in order to push lots of digitised SVGA video data down a long length
> of CAT5e for a KVM application.
Was that really ethernet framing? Or just using the CAT5 cable as 4
differential pairs?
(Not that there's anything wrong with that - I imagine you'd still get good
cable lengths with the right drivers)
--
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
-- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
pgpBGl5Lofiae.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] The coming deluge of CPU cycles, (continued)
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] The coming deluge of CPU cycles, mgray, 2006/07/26
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] The coming deluge of CPU cycles, Nikhil, 2006/07/26
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] The coming deluge of CPU cycles, Eric Blossom, 2006/07/27
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] The coming deluge of CPU cycles, Jason Hecker, 2006/07/27
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] The coming deluge of CPU cycles, Eric Blossom, 2006/07/27
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] The coming deluge of CPU cycles, Jason Hecker, 2006/07/27
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] The coming deluge of CPU cycles, Daniel O'Connor, 2006/07/27
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] The coming deluge of CPU cycles, Alex Gross, 2006/07/27
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] The coming deluge of CPU cycles, Eric Blossom, 2006/07/27
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] The coming deluge of CPU cycles, Daniel O'Connor, 2006/07/27
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] The coming deluge of CPU cycles,
Daniel O'Connor <=
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] The coming deluge of CPU cycles, Jason Hecker, 2006/07/27
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] The coming deluge of CPU cycles, Eric Blossom, 2006/07/27
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] The coming deluge of CPU cycles, Daniel O'Connor, 2006/07/27
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] The coming deluge of CPU cycles, Eric Blossom, 2006/07/28
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] The coming deluge of CPU cycles, Daniel O'Connor, 2006/07/28
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] The coming deluge of CPU cycles, Stephane Fillod, 2006/07/27
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] The coming deluge of CPU cycles, Daniel O'Connor, 2006/07/26