[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] saturation with multi_fft.py
From: |
Eric Blossom |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] saturation with multi_fft.py |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Oct 2007 16:36:17 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 05:11:52PM -0400, address@hidden wrote:
> Thanks-
>
> I just downloaded, compiled and installed this latest revision. When I
> test multi_scope.py in the mutli-antenna examples directory with this
> release I get the same issue. Please note, I have the LF_RX
> daughterboards, so I change the daughterboard ID from BASIC to LF in the
> python code. I also eliminate the second factor of 4 decimation in the
> host (sw_decim = 4) by setting it to 1. I then run with the following
> command:
>
> multi-antenna]$ ./multi_scope.py -f0 -d250 -g0
>
> while acquiring a 10 kHz 0.3 V p-p signal. The max value shown in the
> waveform on the gui is just over 25,000, which is way too much compared to
> the standard usrp_fft.py, which by the way is no longer in the examples
> directory; I used one from a previous release. If I increase the input
> voltage level to 0.4 V p-p, I get a jagged waveform with sharp
> discontinuities.
>
> So, my problem remains. Any ideas?
What's your test signal? Is it your 100kHz wide signal?
Can you try it with -d 400 as described below?
Eric
> On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, Eric Blossom wrote:
>
> >With the halfbands, it's flat to about 70% of the passband.
> >decim = 320 gives 200kS/s complex baseband, a bit more than you'll
> >need.
> >
> >
> >Without the halfbands, I'd use about 4x the bandwidth of interest,
> >then filter and decimate in the host for the final channel selection.
> >In your case, I'd use decim = 160 giving 400kS/s.
Eric
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] saturation with multi_fft.py, (continued)
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] saturation with multi_fft.py, Eric Blossom, 2007/10/08
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] saturation with multi_fft.py, ematlis, 2007/10/09
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] saturation with multi_fft.py, Eric Blossom, 2007/10/09
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] saturation with multi_fft.py, ematlis, 2007/10/09
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] saturation with multi_fft.py, Eric Blossom, 2007/10/09
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] saturation with multi_fft.py, ematlis, 2007/10/09
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] saturation with multi_fft.py, Eric Blossom, 2007/10/09
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] saturation with multi_fft.py, ematlis, 2007/10/09
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] saturation with multi_fft.py, Eric Blossom, 2007/10/09
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] saturation with multi_fft.py, ematlis, 2007/10/09
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] saturation with multi_fft.py,
Eric Blossom <=
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] saturation with multi_fft.py, ematlis, 2007/10/09
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] saturation with multi_fft.py, ematlis, 2007/10/10
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] saturation with multi_fft.py, Eric Blossom, 2007/10/10
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] saturation with multi_fft.py, ematlis, 2007/10/10
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] saturation with multi_fft.py, Eric Blossom, 2007/10/10
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] saturation with multi_fft.py, ematlis, 2007/10/10
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] saturation with multi_fft.py, Brian Padalino, 2007/10/10
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] saturation with multi_fft.py, Dan Halperin, 2007/10/10
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] saturation with multi_fft.py, ematlis, 2007/10/10
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] saturation with multi_fft.py, Brian Padalino, 2007/10/10