discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss-gnuradio] Acoustics instead of radio & what's possible in real-


From: Jim Morash
Subject: [Discuss-gnuradio] Acoustics instead of radio & what's possible in real-time?
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2007 19:16:45 -0500
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022)

Hi,

I'm working on a software-defined acoustic communications transceiver, currently based on DSP-targeted code generated by MATLAB and Simulink. I'm looking into options for converting the project to free software and so far I have been reading about Scicos and GNURadio. As part of moving to a free software platform, I would also transition the system from a DSP target to a general purpose (PC) processor.

I'd like to make the whole system real time capable (rather than data-acq followed by post-processing) and I hope to get an idea from the gnuradio list membership of what is possible on a general purpose processor, and whether GNURadio is a good platform choice for my application. For example, one difference from more typical SDR projects is that we are doing direct quadrature sampling without a HW basebanding front end. In the current design, the receiver does:

- sampling at 4x the carrier (Fc @ 12kHz now, may go up -> 48ksps min, maybe 96ksps in the future?)
- digital I-Q demodulation, decimation
- correlation to detect start-of-packet
- demodulate & decode packet of QPSK symbols (training & data bits) using a digital PLL, decision feedback equalizer and viterbi decoder, currently 200 training symbols & 600 data symbols - a bit of MAC and application layer stuff (but this is lower processor demand)

Is this possible? Or perhaps trivial, compared to RF data rates? Does it look like I'd need to write a bunch of new blocks if I moved to GNU Radio? :)

For comparison, the existing (floating-point) DSP implementation runs a bit behind real time. It takes about 3 seconds to process a packet of length ~0.7 second. I would like to do better. The PC-compatible hardware platform I had in mind is the Via PX10000 (for size/power reasons); it seems fairly fast and has a nice built in audio codec with a high sampling rate.

http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/03/via-epia-px10000-pico-itx-motherboard-gets-reviewed/

I am fairly new to software-defined radio in general. Thanks in advance for any suggestions.

--Jim Morash
address@hidden




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]