|Subject:||[Discuss-gnuradio] Question regarding destructor and member functions in C++ source|
|Date:||Mon, 07 Sep 2009 23:14:45 -0700|
|User-agent:||Thunderbird 22.214.171.124 (X11/20090817)|
Hi all,I was wondering why most of the gnuradio blocks don't have destructor even though they have constructor defined in C++ source(e.g. gr_ofdm_mapper_bcv.cc)? Is that due to the features of smart pointer, boost::shared_ptr<T> ?
Another question is : What is the difference between using "class_name::work()" and "class_name::general_work()". I guess it might depend on their base class (gr_block and gr_sync_block) where they are derived from. I have been using gr_sync_block as my base class. But I don't know the reason for that. How do I know which base class I should use?
Thanks in advance. Milo
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|