[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Why does general_work return large number?
From: |
Eric Blossom |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Why does general_work return large number? |
Date: |
Sat, 5 Jun 2010 07:55:28 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) |
On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 02:23:21PM +0100, Zohair M. Abu Shaban wrote:
>
>
> Dear All,
> I have built a block that uses single input sample to produce a
> single output sample. The weird thing that general_work in gr_block
> returns a number around 4095, 4096. any interpretation or solution
> for this?
First off, why do you think that this is a problem?
You block should be written such that it produces the number of output
items that is requested. It sounds like the block is doing that.
There are many 100's of examples of blocks in the code base.
If you haven't already, please read:
http://www.gnu.org/software/gnuradio/doc/howto-write-a-block.html
It's somewhat out of date, but the fundamentals are correct.
Eric
- [Discuss-gnuradio] Why does general_work return large number?, Zohair M. Abu Shaban, 2010/06/05
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Why does general_work return large number?,
Eric Blossom <=
- RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] Why does general_work return large number?, Zohair M. Abu Shaban, 2010/06/09
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Why does general_work return large number?, Eric Blossom, 2010/06/09
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Why does general_work return large number?, Zohair, 2010/06/10
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Why does general_work return large number?, Zohair, 2010/06/10
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Why does general_work return large number?, Eric Blossom, 2010/06/10
- [Discuss-gnuradio] Gnuradio/Beagleboard modifying flow graph buffer allocation, alfayez, 2010/06/10
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Gnuradio/Beagleboard modifying flow graph buffer allocation, Eric Blossom, 2010/06/11
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Gnuradio/Beagleboard modifying flow graph buffer allocation, Philip Balister, 2010/06/14