[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] More sensitivity tests of the USRP2 + Basic_RX
From: |
Greg Troxel |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] More sensitivity tests of the USRP2 + Basic_RX |
Date: |
Sat, 09 Oct 2010 11:59:58 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) |
"Marcus D. Leech" <address@hidden> writes:
> Using the scope display, I measured the detector output difference
> between nothing connected (which on the BASIC_RX means that
> the A/D is "seeing" the 50-ohm termination across the input-half of
> the balun transformer), and my -46dBm signal connected.
I see your point and your logic, but this seems to be assuming too much.
What if you adjust your signal generator to -110 dBm? That's a fairly
low value, but it should be easily acheivable on most RF signal
generators.
> That difference amounted to a 65dB difference in detected output power.
> Doing the math, does that mean that a "naked"
> USRP2 + Basic_RX is sensitive down to roughly -111dBm, or should I
> factor in root(5KHz), which brings it up to -92dBm.
If you're looking at CW, 5 KHz is huge, and probably as you bring down
the bandwidth you'll get the same output as long as you're in the
passband.
This is how ARRL does receiver tests; it's probably at least good to
understand how you're differing:
http://p1k.arrl.org/~ehare/testproc/testproc.pdf
You could probably convince them to run a set of tests on a USRP-based
radio, sort of a product review without a product and without really
doing the rest of the review.
pgpOCRiN9QO4k.pgp
Description: PGP signature