discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] gr_vmcircbuf_sysv_shm: shmget (1): Invalid argume


From: Tom Rondeau
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] gr_vmcircbuf_sysv_shm: shmget (1): Invalid argument
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:52:04 -0500

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:53 PM, Josh Blum <address@hidden> wrote:
> http://gnuradio.org/cgit/gnuradio.git/commit/?h=next&id=649e4387848a5d9273983600be6f35c3e2a88191
>
> Definitely tags related, that change broke it. -josh


Alright, thanks for tracking it down. I'll see what I can do.

Tom


> On 02/10/2011 12:56 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Josh Blum <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> ./shmget_demo_issue.py -v 1024 -n 2048
>>> gr_vmcircbuf_sysv_shm: shmget (1): Invalid argument
>>> gr_buffer::allocate_buffer: failed to allocate buffer of size 16392 KB
>>> terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::bad_alloc'
>>>  what():  std::bad_alloc
>>> Aborted
>>>
>>>
>>> So, I have the latest gnuradio next and ubuntu 10.10. This issue crops
>>> up whenever I try to run the wxgui fftsink with my usrp2 at full rate,
>>> and on several different computers.
>>>
>>> I have recreated the problem with a simple python app. No message
>>> queues, no usrp hardware, no graphics, just core gnuradio blocks.
>>> Application attached.
>>>
>>> null source -> keep one in n -> null sink
>>>
>>> Basically, increasing the N (decimation) to a high enough number causes
>>> this issue consistently. Why should more decimation cause this? Did
>>> something in the tags implementation change this behavior? Any ideas?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Josh
>>
>>
>> ACK. Thanks for the report and test case. I have no idea what's
>> causing it right now, and I really can't see how the tags would have
>> interfered.
>>
>> What happens if you go back to the master or even the 3.3.0 release package?
>>
>> Tom
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]