|
From: | Marcus D. Leech |
Subject: | Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] FIFO latency |
Date: | Mon, 30 May 2011 09:55:17 -0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 |
On 30/05/2011 9:51 AM, Alexander Chemeris wrote:
I'm dubious of such a claim--the core mechanisms between Unix-domain sockets and FIFOs are very similar.Linux' pipe implementation is known to be quite slow. I would suggest to use UNIX sockets instead. They should perform much better in terms of latency and performance.Good idea.
While it's true that it *used* to be the case that pipes/FIFOs were handled as disk files, that's no longer true--they just implement ring-buffer objects within the kernel, and Unix-domain sockets are also quite similar--in fact, they are likely higher overhead, because they have to go through the labyrinthine socket stack, which FIFOs don't.
I did my part to put together a FIFO test, so if someone wants to do a Unix-domain socket benchmark we could settle
that question.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |