[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Volk branch on github
From: |
Martin DvH |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Volk branch on github |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:45:26 +0100 |
I think it would make sense to change the volk interface by adding
kernel calls which can handle the two alignment cases (aligned,
unaligned).
We would have to add a is_unaligned parameter to the volk kernel calls.
The gnuradio blocks would then change in the following way:
So in stead of:
if(is_unaligned()) {
for(size_t i = 1; i < input_items.size(); i++){
volk_32fc_x2_multiply_32fc_u(out, out, (gr_complex*)input_items[i],
noi);
}
} else {
for(size_t i = 1; i < input_items.size(); i++){
volk_32fc_x2_multiply_32fc_a(out, out, (gr_complex*)input_items[i],
noi);
}
}
You would have:
for(size_t i = 1; i < input_items.size(); i++)
volk_32fc_x2_multiply_32fc(is_unaligned(), out, out,
(gr_complex*)input_items[i], noi);
You halve the amount of code in gnuradio blocks which to my opinion
makes it much more maintainable.
Martin
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 12:06 +0100, Martin DvH wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 22:56 -0500, Tom Rondeau wrote:
> > There's been a ton of work going on in getting us ready to really
> > start using Volk in GNU Radio blocks. Instead of repeating myself,
> > here, you can see more about the who/what/when/why/how of the changes
> > here:
> >
> >
> > http://www.trondeau.com/blog/2012/2/13/gnu-radio-is-crap-and-other-such-insights.html
>
> I think you copied the wrong link.
> You probably meant:
> http://www.trondeau.com/blog/2012/2/13/volk-integration-to-gnu-radio.html
>
>
> Martin
>
> >
> >
> > The basic summary is that I'm seeing amazing performance results and
> > I'm very excited to get this into our project.
> >
> >
> > I'm really hoping that people can check out the branch and test it out
> > against their applications. A number of changes were made inside GNU
> > Radio and a handful of blocks have been converted to using Volk, and
> > I'd like to see how the performance compares. My own tests show great
> > results, but I have a pretty heterogeneous setup (Linux/Ubuntu and
> > Intel processors).
> >
> >
> > I should have another post on my website later this week discussing my
> > benchmark results for the Volk blocks, but anyone interested in
> > testing it out on their own should check out
> > gnuradio-examples/python/volk_benchmark. The README in that directory
> > should help you understand what to do and how to do it.
> >
> >
> > We would like to get this merged into GNU Radio master (and therefore
> > version 3.5.2) as soon as possible, so I would really appreciate
> > feedback and bug reports as soon as possible.
> >
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Tom
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>
- [Discuss-gnuradio] Volk branch on github, Tom Rondeau, 2012/02/14
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Volk branch on github, Martin DvH, 2012/02/15
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Volk branch on github,
Martin DvH <=
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Volk branch on github, Josh Blum, 2012/02/15
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Volk branch on github, Tom Rondeau, 2012/02/15
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Volk branch on github, Josh Blum, 2012/02/16
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Volk branch on github, Tom Rondeau, 2012/02/16
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Volk branch on github, Josh Blum, 2012/02/16
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Volk branch on github, Josh Blum, 2012/02/16
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Volk branch on github, Philip Balister, 2012/02/17
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Volk branch on github, Douglas Geiger, 2012/02/16
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Volk branch on github, Josh Blum, 2012/02/16
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Volk branch on github, Nick Foster, 2012/02/16