discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Problems building GNURadio


From: Philip Balister
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Problems building GNURadio
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 16:08:32 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0

On 09/22/2014 02:13 PM, Tom Tsou wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Michal Jakubiak <address@hidden> wrote:
>> In my original post I was referring to this discussion:
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2014-08/msg00207.html
>> The output I've put in my first post already used these flags. That was for
>> GR 3.7.5
>> I've used distcc to speed up the compilation, but it failed. I'm leaving the
>> BBB for the night to compile 3.7.4 on it's own, just in case if distcc
>> messed something up. If that doesn't work, I guess my next few questions
>> will concern cross compiling and the contents of SDK ;)
> 
> I just compiled master-6e1207475b6942a3 natively on Arndale-Linaro
> with the following settings. Note the change of CMAKE_ASM-ATT_FLAGS to
> CMAKE_ASM_FLAGS to match the previously mentioned cmake commit.
> 
> cmake ../ -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS="-march=armv7-a -mthumb-interwork
> -mfloat-abi=hard -mfpu=neon-vfpv4 -mtune=cortex-a15"
> -DCMAKE_ASM_FLAGS="-march=armv7-a -mthumb-interwork -mfloat-abi=hard
> -mfpu=neon-vfpv4 -mtune=cortex-a15"
> 

We should add the ASM fags to the toolchain files.

> In this case, the native gnuradio build in tmpfs took a very
> reasonable, IMO, 42 min 31 sec.

Reasonable for a patient man :)

Philip

> 
>   -TT
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
> 
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]