[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] M&M clock recovery for async digital signal
From: |
Tomaž Šolc |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] M&M clock recovery for async digital signal |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Feb 2015 18:15:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.4.0 |
On 26. 02. 2015 17:24, Johnathan Corgan wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 1:41 AM, Tomaž Šolc <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>
> I'm trying to synchronize on the bits in an asynchronous digital signal
> using M&M clock recovery block. For instance, roughly 7 samples of +1.
> represent a "1" and roughly 7 samples of -1. represent a "0".
>
> In general, timing recovery algorithms attempt to locate and track the
> "center" of a symbol and output an estimate of what the symbol value is
> at that point. They also work best when they are preceded by a symbol
> matched filter; this both improves signal-to-noise ratio and results in
> a peak near the center that the recovery loop is designed to find.
>
> In your case, your symbol is a rectangular pulse 7 samples wide, of
> bipolar amplitude. A matched filter for this symbol shape is simply a
> moving average filter of the same period. If you add one of these ahead
> of the MM block, it will sync up quite easily.
Thank you for your answer Jonathan. I suspected that the algorithm
doesn't work on rectangular pulses. This is why I performed my test with
a sine wave as well as a rectangular wave (see the block diagram I
linked to)
I think a sine wave of the same frequency as a rectangular wave should
be very close to what is at the output of a symbol matched filter you
mention. However in the setup I described, the MM block doesn't sync to
a sine wave either.
Best regards
Tomaž