[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Discuss-gnuradio Digest, Vol 150, Issue 31

From: John Murphy
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Discuss-gnuradio Digest, Vol 150, Issue 31
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 12:17:55 -0400

Tried this, then deleted the xml file before attempting to make again without it.
Got the following error when re-making (the line with the xml file had a destination which I had thought was just for that file)
What do I need to do to fix this?
- John

CMake Error at grc/CMakeLists.txt:19 (install):
  install FILES given no DESTINATION!

-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
See also "/usr/local/share/gnuradio-OutOfTree-modules/gr-comso/build/CMakeFiles/CMakeOutput.log".
See also "/usr/local/share/gnuradio-OutOfTree-modules/gr-comso/build/CMakeFiles/CMakeError.log".
make: *** [cmake_check_build_system] Error 1

From: Johnathan Corgan <address@hidden>
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 8:26 AM, John Murphy <
> address@hidden> wrote:
> > Anyhow, it unexpectedly generated an xml file to import the non-block into
> > GRC.
> > Is there a best way to just remove that xml file without causing other
> > issues?
> >
> First, do a 'make uninstall' from your build directory, to remove the file
> from where GRC finds it.
> Then, edit grc/CMakeLists.txt and remove the line that has the XML filename
> in it.
> Finally, rerun the build (cmake, make, sudo make install, etc.).
> Also when I tried to drag and drop the non-block into GRC, presumably from
> > the default created xml file with no edits (curiosity always gets one in
> > trouble?) GRC went to a blank screen. Of course I was able to close and
> > restart and pick up at the last save which was fine. Okay none of that is
> > really unexpected.
> >
> In general, gr_modtool creates XML files that need further editing before
> being usable in GRC; in this case, GRC didn't handle the mis-parse very
> well.
> > I guess there must be a reason you would have a noblock that can be added
> > to a flowgraph?
> >
> You can create generic functions with parameters that you can set up as
> variables in GRC.  They aren't blocks added to the flowgraph but are still
> "GRC blocks".

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]