Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] RFNoc and data rates

[Simon Olvhammar]

What would be a good choice for N in this case?
However, this seems very promising and I thank you for your help!

Cheers
Simon

On 09/23/2015 11:40 PM, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
> On 09/23/2015 04:19 PM, Simon Olvhammar wrote:
> > Hi Marcus,
> > No, we also have some spectrometers for atmospheric measurements.
> >
> > Regarding the keep 1 in N. It occurs to me then that by using this I 
> > would loose (N-1)/N percent of the FFT data for a given amount of 
> > observation time? Or am I missing something?
> > Simon
> Since you're integrating prior to decimation here, there should be no 
> loss of information.
>
>
> > Den 2015-09-23 kl. 21:40, skrev Marcus D. Leech:
> > > On 09/23/2015 03:06 PM, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
> > > > On 09/23/2015 02:49 PM, Simon Olvhammar wrote:
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > > Thank you for your answers.
> > > > > Yes we do alot of averaging to expose the signal, in some 
> > > > > applications we even average over several months.
> > > Are these astronomical spectral features?   They usually aren't that 
> > > wide, even with doppler spreading.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> > > address@hidden
> > > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio