[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Draft Proposal GSoC: Offline Analysis and Visuali

From: Usman Haider
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Draft Proposal GSoC: Offline Analysis and Visualization Tools
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 20:39:20 +0500

Hi Martin,

Thanks for your comments. As mentioned in proposal core deliverable is a user friendly GUI that allow users to perform operations mentioned in section 4 of the proposal. Please see following link for the GUI:


Its definitely not final/complete. I'll target pyqtgraph which is built on PyQt4 / PySide and numpy. However, layout of GUI will be finalized after discussion with mentor.


Reading your proposal, I don't understand what tools exactly I'll have
after you're finished, and how they would look like. Can you provide
some examples and/or mockups?


On 03/24/2016 01:11 PM, Usman Haider wrote:
> Hi Nathan,
> I appreciate the time you spent reading the draft and providing such
> detailed feedback. I have uploaded some related MATLAB code on my github
> account [1]. I have added some snapshots in the directory as well so
> that one can see the output without running code. Also uploaded java
> code written for android application that plots spectrum (magnitude and
> phase) of data received on Bluetooth [2]. I have added these in my
> proposal. I am mentioning here for quick reference. I have updated my
> proposal according to your feedback. You can find updated proposal  here:
> https://github.com/UHaider/GSoC/blob/master/GSOC%20Proposal.pdf
> Thanks again for your feedback.
> Regards,
> Usman
> [1] https://github.com/UHaider/PastCode/tree/master/MATLAB
> [2] https://github.com/UHaider/PastCode/tree/master/Android
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:01 PM, West, Nathan
> <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>     Looking through the proposal I mostly see your translation of the
>     idea from the GSoC ideas list to a proposal format. All of that is
>     fine, but we've already decided this is a reasonable idea and the
>     proposal should convince us that you're the right person to work on it.
>     You've provided the right evidence that you've read some of the GSoC
>     pages, but my current criticism boils down to missing information
>     that we ask for
>     here: http://gnuradio.org/redmine/projects/gnuradio/wiki/GSoCStudentInfo
>     I'll point out *some* specifics but please don't just list responses
>     to these things in the proposal. Rather reshape it to giving us an
>     idea of what you want to do (which you have) and why you're the
>     right person. The list I'm providing is not meant to be exhaustive,
>     and I'm not suggesting that you're not the right person to do this,
>     just that you haven't addressed that (or your eligibility for GSoC
>     in your proposal. It's also possible I am being dense and missed
>     some of this information.
>     From the page I linked you're missing:
>     * Proof of your coding capabilities (this is the big one)
>     * University and student status (more of a formality)
>     * why do you want to do *this* project? (this is not critical, but
>     if you've done any classes or work in areas related to your proposal
>     idea than that looks very good)
>     Ideally this is all more than a single sentence that says "I did a
>     matlab simulation once in a class and it was cool", but much less
>     than a college admissions essay on why DSP will save the world.
>     Looking forward to the next draft (and hopefully faster turnaround),
>     -Nathan
>     PS - most of this email can be copy and pasted as feedback for
>     several other proposals I've read so far.
>     On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 6:19 AM, Usman Haider
>     <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>         I have not get any feedback on this yet. I hope I have not
>         missed anything important? Please, provide feedback on this.
>         Regards,
>         Usman
>         On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Usman Haider
>         <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>             I have added lambda _expression_ in deliverables based on
>             Tim's comments. This will allow user to enter lambda
>             _expression_ in GUI. That _expression_ will be then evaluated on
>             samples and result will be displayed. Rather than providing
>             fixed mathematical function (scale/normalize), user  can
>             apply anonymous functions, they want, on samples using
>             Lambda construct. This will give user more flexibility. I
>             have updated my proposal. You can see it on following link
>             https://github.com/UHaider/GSoC/blob/master/GSOC%20Proposal.pdf
>             Awaiting feedback.
>             Regards,
>             Usman
>             On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Usman Haider
>             <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>
>             wrote:
>                 Hi Community,
>                 I have made my proposal for the subject GSoC idea.
>                 Please have a look and give feedback. Thanks for your time.
>                 https://github.com/UHaider/GSoC/blob/master/GSOC%20Proposal.pdf
>                 Regards,
>                 Usman

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]