discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Problems with Correlation Estimator in GNURadio


From: Shruti Gupta
Subject: Re: Problems with Correlation Estimator in GNURadio
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 15:37:09 +0530
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0

Hi!

Thanks for your reply.

While I'll work on installing and working with GRC 3.8, I was just wondering will the over the air communication be bad enough to not even receive a single correct packet? Is it to do with loop_bw for FLL, PFB and Costas_Loop or the digital gain values (a multiply block for the source signal) in RX? What is the logic behind setting of the loop_bw of these blocks?

Thanks and Regards
SG

On 15/05/20 6:34 pm, Shruti Gupta wrote:
Hi!

I have been trying to use the packet communication examples under gr-digital in GNURadio(v 3.7.14.0) on ubuntu machines with LimeSDR Mini for over the air communication.  I am using the usrp_packet_tx.grc and uspr_packet_rx.grc  to transmit and receive BPSK modulated packets respectively. I have modified these examples for LimeSDR Mini by including LimeSDR source and sink blocks and setting up the parameters. Now, I am running TX on one machine and RX on another machine tuned to same frequency. However, when I keep the gain values for RX low since the distance between TX and RX is few feet and eliminating the possibility of RX saturation, the packets are not being detected, while for higher gain values packets get detected but the correlation start tags are tagged before the position of estimation tags. I am not too sure if that's how it is suppose to work.

Moreover, even after being detected the packets are not decoded and I receive following message  on console:

INFO: Parser returned #f

I think this is due to either incorrect header decoding or incorrect packet detection which freezes the header/payload demux block in the flowgraph. Also, even for very few packets that are decoded, the header is incorrect so why does the packet even gets decoded? Is there a way to work around this problem? Can we use some other block for packet detection?

Any suggestion or help is highly appreciated.

Thanks in anticipation
SG



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]