discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Question on Gnuradio Polyphase Channelizer Block?


From: George Edwards
Subject: Re: Question on Gnuradio Polyphase Channelizer Block?
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 09:35:29 -0700

Hi Ron,

That is good! I have Gnuradio 3.7.13.4 on one of my computers. Please send me the grc file as an attachment as soon as you can.
This way, I can learn how to use the Gnuradio Polyphase Channelizer block.

Thank you!

Respectfully,
George

On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 8:58 AM Ron Economos <w6rz@comcast.net> wrote:

It's a GNU Radio 3.7 flow graph. It can be converted by GNU Radio 3.8.

Ron

On 12/22/20 07:47, George Edwards wrote:
  Hi Ron,

Thanks again for your help.

When I click on the link you provided, I get the XML file. Please send me the actual grc file as a standalone.

Thank you!

Regards,
George

On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 2:47 PM Ron Economos <w6rz@comcast.net> wrote:
You should probably use an add block instead of Streams to Stream.
Here's an example flow graph.

http://www.w6rz.net/pfb-filter-10.grc

Ron

On 12/21/20 11:20, George Edwards wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have three signals routed to the Gnuradio Polyphase Channelizer
> Block. The system operates at a sample rate of 90 kHz with 3 channels
> spaced 25 kHz apart. One channel is centered around DC and the other
> two at +/-25 kHz. The 3 waveforms are routed into a Gnuradio Streams
> to Stream Block, so that a simple concatenated stream flows into the
> Gnuradio Polyphase Channelizer. I also set the Channelizer Block to
> use 120 Taps and provide 3-outputs. Here are my questions on observing
> the outputs
>
> Q1. I was expecting each output (block set to 3 outputs) to be at the
> sample rate (90 kHz/3 =) 30 kz in each of the 3-plots. The plots show
> a sample rate based on the original rate of 90 kHz. Why is this?
>
> Q2. I expected each output waveform to be centered around DC, but they
> were instead centered around -25 kHz. Why?
>
> Q3. The output bandwidth for each waveform seems a little bigger than
> the input, why?
>
> I will appreciate any help that assists to point me in the right
> direction.
>
> Regards,
> George


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]