discuss-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gnustep on redhat 7.0


From: Ovidiu Predescu
Subject: Re: gnustep on redhat 7.0
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2000 01:47:03 -0700

Hi,

It looks like Redhat decided to distribute on RH 7.0 an experimental version of
the GCC compiler suite. The 2.96 version of GCC distributed with RH 7.0 is not
supported by the GCC team, thus it shouldn't be considered a production
compiler. I believe Redhat screwed up this distribution by releasing GCC 2.96
with it.

Nevertheless the current top-of-the-trunk GCC compiler breaks on your test
programs; I'll try to make sure the next release of GCC works fine.

Regards,
Ovidiu

 > From: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at> 
 > Sender: gcc-announce-owner@gcc.gnu.org 
 > To: gcc-announce@gcc.gnu.org 
 > Subject: GCC 2.96
 >          
 > Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 01:58:11 +0200 (CEST) 
 >  
 > It has come to our attention that some GNU/Linux distributions are
 > currently shipping with ``GCC 2.96''.
 > 
 > We would like to point out that GCC 2.96 is not a formal GCC release nor
 > will there ever be such a release.  Rather, GCC 2.96 has been the code-
 > name for our development branch that will eventually become GCC 3.0.
 > 
 > Current snapshots of GCC, and any version labeled 2.96, produce object
 > files that are not compatible with those produced by either GCC 2.95.2 or
 > the forthcoming GCC 3.0.  Therefore, programs built with these snapshots
 > will not be compatible with any official GCC release.  Actually, C and
 > Fortran code will probably be compatible, but code in other languages,
 > most notably C++ due to incompatibilities in symbol encoding (``mangling''),
 > the standard library and the application binary interface (ABI), is likely
 > to fail in some way.  Static linking against C++ libraries may make a
 > binary more portable, at the cost of increasing file size and memory use.
 > 
 > To avoid any confusion, we have bumped the version of our current
 > development branch to GCC 2.97.
 > 
 > Please note that both GCC 2.96 and 2.97 are development versions; we
 > do not recommend using them for production purposes.  Binaries built
 > using any version of GCC 2.96 or 2.97 will not be portable to systems
 > based on one of our regular releases.
 > 
 > If you encounter a bug in a compiler labeled 2.96, we suggest you
 > contact whoever supplied the compiler as we can not support 2.96
 > versions that were not issued by the GCC team.
 > 
 > Please see http://gcc.gnu.org/snapshots.html if you want to use our
 > latest snapshots.  We suggest you use 2.95.2 if you are uncertain.
 > 
 > The GCC Steering Committee <http://gcc.gnu.org/steering.html>


Attachment: pgpRHBjO2Cc0s.pgp
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]