[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: BSDConfig
From: |
ian . mondragon |
Subject: |
RE: BSDConfig |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 16:03:50 -0500 |
i agree completely on all points, being a near-rabid-anti-M$-pursist
myself...that's why i put in the e-snicker after mentioning the SplashConfig
object. it was just a toy hack to swap out the splash.bmp file & enable it
at boot...it'll only take a few more lines of code to add a checkbox & a
textfield (for the image path) in whatever gui pane i choose to put it
in...if i put it in.
about the EmacsConfig...i realize that a massive amount of people use emacs,
i just happen to not be one of them. like i said, no EmacsConfig
_for_now_...i'll get around to it.
any other thoughts?
thanks,
-ian
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Philippe C.D. Robert [SMTP:phr@studiosendai.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 3:42 PM
> To: Mondragon, Ian
> Cc: discuss-gnustep@gnu.org; apps-gnustep@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: BSDConfig
>
> On Fri, 27 Oct 2000 14:58:14 -0500
> ian.mondragon@bankofamerica.com wrote:
>
> > 2) Is there anything that should be in here that I overlooked?
> > [NOTE: I don't use Emacs. No EmacsConfig for
> > now...]
>
> Well, I emacs would be very cool, nevertheless...;-)
>
> Anyway, what is more important is that Splash screens are IMHO *very bad*,
> ugly and a typical feature of the M$ invented UI 'concepts'. So my
> question: are they really needed - or perhaps I do not get the point
> here...;-)
>
> cheers, Phil
> --
> Philippe C.D. Robert
> Developer - StudioSendai.com
- BSDConfig, ian . mondragon, 2000/10/27
- RE: BSDConfig,
ian . mondragon <=
- Re: BSDConfig, Christian Edward Gruber, 2000/10/27
- Re: BSDConfig, Philippe C . D . Robert, 2000/10/27
- Re: BSDConfig, Christian Edward Gruber, 2000/10/27
- Re: BSDConfig, Philippe C . D . Robert, 2000/10/27
- Re: BSDConfig, Christian Edward Gruber, 2000/10/27
- Re: BSDConfig, Philippe C . D . Robert, 2000/10/28