[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BSDConfig
From: |
Christian Edward Gruber |
Subject: |
Re: BSDConfig |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 17:20:25 -0400 |
Folks... NeXTSTEP had TONS! of splashscreens, and I hate to tell you,but most
usability gurus recommend them as indicators of progress in load-up.
Specifically progress indicators reduce user dissatisfaction, as they give an
indicator of user time investment.
Sorry to blow any anti-M$ sentiment, but if this is indeed an "evil", it's not
one that MS invented. And I disagree that it is an evil at all. Now modal
splashscreens which prevent you from changing window focus... they _are_
evil... ;)
And besides, splash screens are a great place to drop in amusements, as the
Lighthouse and other folks often used to do.
regards,
christian.
----- Original Message -----
From: <ian.mondragon@bankofamerica.com>
To: <phr@studiosendai.com>
Cc: <discuss-gnustep@gnu.org>; <apps-gnustep@gnu.org>
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 5:03 PM
Subject: RE: BSDConfig
> i agree completely on all points, being a near-rabid-anti-M$-pursist
> myself...that's why i put in the e-snicker after mentioning the SplashConfig
> object. it was just a toy hack to swap out the splash.bmp file & enable it
> at boot...it'll only take a few more lines of code to add a checkbox & a
> textfield (for the image path) in whatever gui pane i choose to put it
> in...if i put it in.
>
- BSDConfig, ian . mondragon, 2000/10/27
- RE: BSDConfig, ian . mondragon, 2000/10/27
- Re: BSDConfig,
Christian Edward Gruber <=
- Re: BSDConfig, Philippe C . D . Robert, 2000/10/27
- Re: BSDConfig, Christian Edward Gruber, 2000/10/27
- Re: BSDConfig, Philippe C . D . Robert, 2000/10/27
- Re: BSDConfig, Christian Edward Gruber, 2000/10/27
- Re: BSDConfig, Philippe C . D . Robert, 2000/10/28