[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Nuke libgmodel?
From: |
Gregory Casamento |
Subject: |
Re: Nuke libgmodel? |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Feb 2001 07:03:28 -0800 (PST) |
--- Nicola Pero <nicola@brainstorm.co.uk> wrote:
<snippage>
> I agree but I suggest postponing this after we have a working Gorm.
I very much agree with this.
> > Thus, a gmodel would be a transfer format for Gorm to load for tweaking,
> > before saving as a .gorm file.
>
> I agree - that's the target we are after.
Cool, this is close to what I mentioned in a previous note.
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnustep mailing list
> Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
=====
======================================================
Gregory John Casamento Sr. Software Engineer
======================================================
Software patents are endangering the computer industry
in the US and around the world. Join the LPF and help
the cause. http://lpf.ai.mit.edu/
======================================================
__________________________________________________
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
Re: Nuke libgmodel?, Gregory Casamento, 2001/02/05