[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "toll-free bridging"
From: |
Frederic Stark |
Subject: |
Re: "toll-free bridging" |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Mar 2001 14:23:36 +0100 |
> Can GNUStep use Apple's "Core Foundation"?
I don't think so. See <http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/apsl.html> for
details.
> Core Foundation is part of Darwin (thus open source and free in
the BSD meaning of
> free)
More precisely <http://www.opensource.apple.com//apsl/>, which is not BSD.
> and highly portable (in fact IIRC it has already been ported to several
> eunuchs platforms). What's neat about it is Apple has basically
taken OpenStep
> Foundation and wrote a plain C interface for it without crippling
it. What's nice
> about this is I can write a model class for an existing library
and people can write
> a platform-specific view and controller class in C or C++ while I
can use AppKit. I
> can do this because Core Foundation and Cocoa Foundation objects are
> interchangeable (what Apple calls "Toll-free bridging".
This is marketing. Recent flames on osx-dev about NSDictionary ==
NSMutableDictionary let me think that the toll may not be that free
for everyone.
Just my 2c.
Cheers,
--fred
- "toll-free bridging", strobe anarkhos, 2001/03/16
- Re: "toll-free bridging",
Frederic Stark <=
- Re: "toll-free bridging", strobe anarkhos, 2001/03/16
- Re: "toll-free bridging", Nicola Pero, 2001/03/16
- Re: "toll-free bridging", strobe anarkhos, 2001/03/16
- Re: "toll-free bridging", Stefan Boehringer, 2001/03/16
- Re: "toll-free bridging", Jeff Teunissen, 2001/03/16
- Re: "toll-free bridging", Jeff Teunissen, 2001/03/16
- Re: "toll-free bridging", strobe anarkhos, 2001/03/17
- Re: "toll-free bridging", Jeff Teunissen, 2001/03/17
- Re: "toll-free bridging", strobe anarkhos, 2001/03/17
- Re: "toll-free bridging", Nicola Pero, 2001/03/17