Re: GNUstep version number(s) (was: Re: GNUstep article (was: Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits))

[Nicola Pero]

> That reminds me...
> 
> Am I missing some header files or is only GNUSTEP_BASE_VERSION defined?
> A more general GNUSTEP_VERSION definition (for overall progress) would
> come in handy, occasionally.

the problem is, a more general GNUSTEP_VERSION does not make sense any
longer.

gnustep-make, gnustep-base, gnustep-gui, gnustep-x?ps are now separate
packages, which can (and are) released at different times with different
version numbers.  Each one should have its own version variables.