[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep version number(s) (was: Re: GNUstep article (was: Re:gnustep
From: |
Alvin Jee |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep version number(s) (was: Re: GNUstep article (was: Re:gnustep compared to other toolkits)) |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Jun 2001 17:25:05 -0700 |
Howdy All!
Around Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Dennis Leeuw thusly wrote:
> That means we have two audiences to address:
> 1- Developers
> 2- Users
Yes, and I would add a subtle distinction to audience 2 -- users who do
not use the GNUstep user environment, but want to use a GNUstep-based app.
I'm working on a GNUstep-based app that will be run by people who can't
care less about the KDE/Gnome/CDE/Linux/Solaris/HPUX/GNUstep jumble. They
want to use my app to get their job done and I want to develop the app
using GNUstep (gui).
The thing I need to figure out is how to deploy my app onto machines
that are not running GNUstep at all. E.g. I need to know which libraries my
install script needs to include with the app and which daemons need to be
there and so on. I can't have my customers downloading stuff from the 'Net
and installing anything. I have to have a complete package ready to go.
So, ideally, I would separate the GNUstep stuff into 3 parts:
- GNUstep developer things
- GNUstep user run-time package
- GNUstep user environment (Workspace, Mail, ...)
BTW, my customers are all using CDE on Solaris/sparc machines. Oh, and I
think that GNUstep has infinitely more value-add _with_ the gui package
and that GNUstep-base is not very interesting all by itself (although it is
still great in and of itself) ... IMHO... :-)
Cheers!
---
Alvin Jee
mailto:alvinj@hpl.com
NeXTmail gleefully accepted!
Sending bits through the Internet since 1984.
- Re: GNUstep article (was: Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits), (continued)
- Re: GNUstep article (was: Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits), Chris B . Vetter, 2001/06/22
- GNUstep version number(s) (was: Re: GNUstep article (was: Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits)), Chris B . Vetter, 2001/06/22
- Re: GNUstep version number(s) (was: Re: GNUstep article (was: Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits)), Nicola Pero, 2001/06/25
- Re: GNUstep version number(s) (was: Re: GNUstep article (was: Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits)), Chris B . Vetter, 2001/06/25
- Re: GNUstep version number(s) (was: Re: GNUstep article (was: Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits)), Nicola Pero, 2001/06/26
- Re: GNUstep version number(s), Chris B . Vetter, 2001/06/26
- Re: GNUstep version number(s), Adam Fedor, 2001/06/26
- Re: GNUstep version number(s) (was: Re: GNUstep article (was: Re:gnustep compared to other toolkits)), Dennis Leeuw, 2001/06/26
- GNUstep packaging (was RE: GNUstep version number(s)), Lyndon Tremblay, 2001/06/26
- Re: GNUstep version number(s) (was: Re: GNUstep article (was: Re:gnustep compared to other toolkits)), Chris B . Vetter, 2001/06/26
- Re: GNUstep version number(s) (was: Re: GNUstep article (was: Re:gnustep compared to other toolkits)),
Alvin Jee <=
- Re: GNUstep version number(s) (was: Re: GNUstep article (was: Re:gnustep compared to other toolkits)), Laurent Julliard, 2001/06/27
- Re: GNUstep version number(s) (was: Re: GNUstep article (was: Re:gnustep compared to other toolkits)), Chris B . Vetter, 2001/06/27
- Re: GNUstep version number(s) (was: Re: GNUstep article (was: Re:gnustep compared to other toolkits)), M. Grabert, 2001/06/27
- quo vadis gnustep? (was Re: GNUstep version number(s) (was: Re: GNUstep article (was: Re:gnustep compared to other toolkits))), Björn Gohla, 2001/06/27
- Re: GNUstep version number(s) (was: Re: GNUstep article (was: Re:gnustep compared to other toolkits)), Chris B . Vetter, 2001/06/27
- Re: GNUstep version number(s) (was: Re: GNUstep article (was: Re:gnustep compared to other toolkits)), M. Grabert, 2001/06/28
- Re: GNUstep version number(s) (was: Re: GNUstep article (was: Re:gnustep compared to other toolkits)), Chris B . Vetter, 2001/06/28
- Re: GNUstep version number(s) (was: Re: GNUstep article (was: Re:gnustep compared to other toolkits)), M. Grabert, 2001/06/29
- Re: GNUstep version number(s) (was: Re: GNUstep article (was: Re:gnustep compared to other toolkits)), Chris B . Vetter, 2001/06/29
- Re: GNUstep article (was: Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits), M. Grabert, 2001/06/22