discuss-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Odd build behavior?


From: Bob Gilson
Subject: Re: Odd build behavior?
Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 14:39:49 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020510

e.sammer wrote:

All:

I am getting NSRangeExceptions when making a call to [NSUnarchiver unarchiveObjectWithData:] as it tries to read the typestream. With some help from some folks on #gnustep, we tried to track it down to no avail.

Here's what's strange... What _does_ fix the problem is compiling with debug=yes. Any other build "styles" (i.e. debug=no, warn=blah, etc.) yeild a nonfunctional binary with the above problem. Of course, I can't say for sure if this is a GS thing (I don't think it is) but if anyone else sees this behavior in GS, please let me know as I do need to build non-debugging versions of my work at some point.

One of the things that may be a contributing factor (this is shotgun debugging) is that I compiled gcc 3.1 but did not update glibc anytime recently which just feels wrong. Either way, it's really really odd and if anyone has an idea about what it could be... etc, etc...

Thanks in advance.


I've installed gcc 3.1 on RH 7.1 with glibc-2.2.2-10. My most recent update from cvs was a couple days ago. I've seen the same error you describe. And I've seen another when starting gdnc and gpbs:

[bgilson@wallace bgilson]$ 2002-05-24 13:08:50.477 gdnc[1750] unable to bind to port 191.0.0.0:0 - Cannot
assign requested address
2002-05-24 13:08:50.524 gdnc[1750] gdnc - unable to register with name server - quiting.

gdomap is starting without error messages.

My network is 192.168.1.0 and 191.0.0.0 doesn't exist in the source code. If I build base with debug=yes, then gdnc and gpbs start without error messages. Other duties have kept me from making more progress. Rats.

Hope this helps,
Bob




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]