[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: relocation against dynamic symbol _objc_lookup_class [address@hidden
From: |
Harald Simon |
Subject: |
Re: relocation against dynamic symbol _objc_lookup_class [address@hidden] |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Nov 2002 19:21:50 +0100 |
Thanks!
-- And I thought, that I have read the configure instructions of gcc well. :-)
-- Yes, I build gcc by myself. After removing of the current object tree of the
last rebuild and a third try, I got the neccessary .so-files of objc. gui can
now be build, but... look into the new question [`NSMiddleMouseDown' undeclared]
Harald
On 2002.11.10 07:25 Jason Clouse wrote:
> <<The compilation is done with the current stable gcc release (3.2). I
> suppose, that I have to build the objc-runtime as a shared library. Is my
> oppionen right, and what have I to do?>>
>
> Yes, you need to build it shared. When you built gcc (if you built gcc)
> you needed to pass configure the --enable-shared option. I believe that
> it's automatic for most of the libraries *except* for objc-runtime...for
> some odd reason.
>
> If you built gcc yourself, build again, passing the --enable-shared
> option (make sure you don't pass it a list because objc has no list
> identifier) and you will also probably want to pass --enable-threads,
> just to be on the safe side.
>
> If you don't want to build gcc yourself, I believe you can get a separate
> objc-runtime out of GNUstep cvs (checkout the dev-libs module). It's
> meant for gcc 2.95.x though, so I'm not sure how it's going to go with
> 3.2.
>
> My advice would be to just build 3.2--it's much less buggy anyway.
>
> Jason
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________
>
> Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today
>
> Only $9.95 per month!
>
> Visit www.juno.com
>
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: relocation against dynamic symbol _objc_lookup_class [address@hidden],
Harald Simon <=