[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt??
From: |
Chris B. Vetter |
Subject: |
Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt?? |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jun 2003 11:16:44 -0700 |
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 19:12:32 +0200
Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf <Lars.Sonchocky-Helldorf@bbdo-interone.de>
wrote:
> I think it would be the best effort to maintain the documentation in
> the sourcefiles and create the online docs automatically from it,
> maybe during the process that creates the daily snapshots. So
> everything will be in sync and up to date - no double work will be
> needed.
That's what I do on gnustep.us. Apache has a path alias for
Documentation that points to /System/Library/Documentation/
So whenever I update GNUstep (including the documentation)
the online docu automatically is up-to-date.
--
Chris
- Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt??, (continued)
- Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt??, Pascal Bourguignon, 2003/06/16
- Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt??, Chris B. Vetter, 2003/06/16
- Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt??, Pascal Bourguignon, 2003/06/16
- Back to the main thread (was: Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt?? ), Chris B. Vetter, 2003/06/16
- Back to the main thread (was: Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt?? ), Pascal Bourguignon, 2003/06/16
- Re: Back to the main thread (was: Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt?? ), Chris B. Vetter, 2003/06/16
- Re: Back to the main thread (was: Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt?? ), Eric Christopherson, 2003/06/21
- Re: Back to the main thread (was: Re: Why is GNUstep lesssuccessful than GTK and Qt?? ), Adam Fedor, 2003/06/21
- Most elegant solution to Reader/Writer Problem with Objective-C?, Lachlan Deck, 2003/06/18
Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt??, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2003/06/16
- Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt??,
Chris B. Vetter <=