[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PATCH: Merge objc-improvements-branch to mainline
From: |
Pete French |
Subject: |
Re: PATCH: Merge objc-improvements-branch to mainline |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Sep 2003 00:42:12 +0100 |
> It's '@synchronized' (sorry, couldn't resist :-) ), and it currently
Ah well, another one to add to the list of "things to edit before typing
make the second time" along witn NSColour -> NSColor then :-)
> only works
> with the NeXT runtime (i.e., on Darwin systems).
...because you can guarantee what threads library you will be linking against
preseumably ? On systems with more than one threads library then I guess
aany implementation in libobjc is going to have to specify what threads
library it neeeds linking against to work I guess (or at least say that it
links to a library providing a certain call for thread locking and
waiting primitves).
Actually that change looks quite nice, though having thread primitives
in a language which is completely unaware of threads in all other
ways seeems a bit odd. You wernt tempted to add in a few extra bits of
syntax to support parallelism in the language itself at all were you ?
-bat.
Re: PATCH: Merge objc-improvements-branch to mainline, Ziemowit Laski, 2003/09/24
Re: PATCH: Merge objc-improvements-branch to mainline, Alexander Malmberg, 2003/09/25
Re: PATCH: Merge objc-improvements-branch to mainline, Ziemowit Laski, 2003/09/25
Re: PATCH: Merge objc-improvements-branch to mainline, Alexander Malmberg, 2003/09/25
Re: PATCH: Merge objc-improvements-branch to mainline, Ziemowit Laski, 2003/09/25
Re: PATCH: Merge objc-improvements-branch to mainline, Pete French, 2003/09/24
Re: PATCH: Merge objc-improvements-branch to mainline, David Ayers, 2003/09/24