discuss-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Renaissance


From: Michael Baehr
Subject: Re: Renaissance
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 09:50:10 -0800

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Frankly, I think this would be a terrible idea.  Let me explain why:

One of the primary purposes of Renaissance is to allow easy cross-platform development on both OS X and GNUstep. Making the primary interface builder be a GNUstep one (Gorm) woud thus force anyone developing for Renaissance on OS X to either:

1. Go through the laborious process of installing GNUstep (if that's even possible) or do it on another PC with GNUstep/Gorm
2. Hand-code the interface in GSMarkup

Thus leaving them at a remarkable disadvantage, similar to how GNUstep developers would be disadvantaged if only Interface Builder were to output GSMarkup files The interface editor for Renaissance should be as cross-platform as Renaissance itself and should, imho, be written in Renaissance.

On Dec 8, 2003, at 4:39 AM, Calvin Mitchell wrote:

Rather than create a separate graphical editor, why
not get Gorm to output Renaissance files on demand??

=====
Calvin L. Mitchell
The Citadel
http://www.geocities.com/calvin674
calvin674@yahoo.com
Yahoo! Messenger, AIM, ICQ, Odigo, IDs: Quasaur, StaahrHamre, calvin674


_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)

iD8DBQE/1LnZEE/935L/FjcRAr9eAKDGCBtt5yTaaS+PqpojtStTTcQxQwCfTP0r
3FOXH35B/hipvOAyC2uZrkU=
=0ZYo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]