[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep audit
From: |
Alexander Malmberg |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep audit |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Dec 2003 18:06:54 +0100 |
Adam Fedor wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 10, 2003, at 05:01 PM, Alexander Malmberg wrote:
> >
> > Also, Riccardo Mottola had a cvs tree from ~2003-10-22 around, and
> > there
> > were no unexpected changes between it and the 2003-10-26 snapshot.
> >
> > (All this is for core/; I haven't checked anything else yet.)
> >
>
> I've checked core as well. Also, here's a list of all the projects and
> the current status. If anyone is interested in checking any of them (or
> has already), let me know.
For each one, I think it's important to know against what it was
checked, how it was checked, and who did it.
> Projects Status
> -------- --------
[snip]
> test/gtests
I've audited a diff of dev-apps/test/gtests/ between savannah's 'latest'
tree and savannah's 2003-09-16 tree, and everything was ok.
- Alexander Malmberg
- GNUstep audit, Alexander Malmberg, 2003/12/10
- Re: GNUstep audit, Adam Fedor, 2003/12/11
- Re: GNUstep audit,
Alexander Malmberg <=
- Re: GNUstep audit, Adam Fedor, 2003/12/11
- Re: GNUstep audit, Gregory John Casamento, 2003/12/12
- Re: GNUstep audit, Serg Stoyan, 2003/12/12
- Re: GNUstep audit, d.ayers, 2003/12/13
- Re[2]: GNUstep audit, Manuel Guesdon, 2003/12/15
- Re: GNUstep audit, Stefan Urbanek, 2003/12/11
- Re: GNUstep audit, Enrico Sersale, 2003/12/12
- Re: GNUstep audit, Enrico Sersale, 2003/12/12