[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [stes'sism] Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator
From: |
Greg Parker |
Subject: |
Re: [stes'sism] Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:57:15 -0700 |
On Apr 23, 2004, at 2:06 AM, Helge Hess wrote:
is it really necessary to spam the _gnustep-discuss list_ with David
Stes discussions?
If I want to have that entertainment, I can always go to
comp.lang.objective-c or just read the archives given that the
argumentation always runs the same way ...
Unfortunately, a news posting was cross-posted to both
comp.lang.objective-c and gnu.gnustep.discuss (which is presumably a
news->mail gateway). Hopefully that thread will die down soon and leave
gnustep-discuss unpolluted.
--
Greg Parker gparker@apple.com Runtime Wrangler
Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, David Stes, 2004/04/21
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, John C. Randolph, 2004/04/22
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, Pete French, 2004/04/22
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, David Stes, 2004/04/22
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, John C. Randolph, 2004/04/23
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, David Stes, 2004/04/23
- [stes'sism] Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, Helge Hess, 2004/04/23
- Re: [stes'sism] Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator,
Greg Parker <=
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, Markus Hitter, 2004/04/23
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, John C. Randolph, 2004/04/23
Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, David Stes, 2004/04/24
Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, Gregory John Casamento, 2004/04/24