[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: why not DirectFB?
From: |
Chad Hardin |
Subject: |
Re: why not DirectFB? |
Date: |
Thu, 27 May 2004 08:01:14 -1000 |
Yeah, I'm working on this, but it's slow. one of those "Real Life"
things.
I don't think there would be any objections to accepting a directfb
patch once I have one :-)
Remember though, some people prefer X.
Chad
On May 27, 2004, at 6:23 AM, andrez wrote:
Hey, guys, why would we not try to look at what Chad Hardin is doing.
He uses Direct FB, but not X11. He was writing an "ObjC wrapper
around DirectFB".
Maybe it is better to try to get rid of that buggy X stuff?
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
- why not DirectFB?, andrez, 2004/05/27
- Re: why not DirectFB?,
Chad Hardin <=
- Message not available