[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re[2]: Debug libs
From: |
Adam Fedor |
Subject: |
Re: Re[2]: Debug libs |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Jun 2004 16:16:53 -0600 |
On Jun 4, 2004, at 11:38 AM, Manuel Guesdon wrote:
For non debug: speed and size (I don't know the exact exact impact
factor)
For debug: debug informations/verifications.
We don't really need to change that. We can still have a debug=yes
flag, which would add debugging info and turn on any other flags we
want. The only change is that the library name would stay the same
regardless of debug=yes or debug=no. Then you can freely mix libraries,
frameworks, etc with debugging info and without, without breaking
anything.
The other alternative (at least one I had thought of), is to make sure
framework libs and bundles executables with debug=yes had different
names, but they would be stored in the same location
(MyBundle.bundle/MyBundle and MyBundle.bundle/MyBundle_d for instance).
In once case, make would be responsible for finding the correct
framework lib and in the second, NSBundle would be responsible for
loading the correct bundle executable (or raising an exception if it
could not). That's more complication, though.
Re: Debug libs, Alex Perez, 2004/06/04