Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?

[Ziemowit Laski]

On 19 Nov 2004, at 5.01, Richard Kenner wrote:

>     Since Geoff has objected to every design proposal I made, then
>     naturally I was (and am) expecting a constructive alternative.
>
> It would be nice if such a thing could be done, but I don't see it as
> a requirement.  It is, after all, your project and what you are
> essentially doing is asking for him to do the design for you.

I'm not asking for a design; I'm asking for a green light to pursue a 
design direction.  And since none of my ideas are to Geoff's liking, 
then naturally I'd like to know what _would_ be to his (and other 
maintainers') liking.

--Zem