[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: more graphic file formats
From: |
Vaisburd, Haim |
Subject: |
RE: more graphic file formats |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Dec 2004 18:25:59 -0800 |
Yes, I also think we should not introduce another
library dependency. We currenly have TIFF, JPEG, PNG,
not sure about GIF. I though this was plenty...
On the other hand, can we _write_ these formats now?
Tima.
--- Gregory John Casamento <greg_casamento@yahoo.com> wrote:
> My concerns here are:
> 2) ImageMagick is not part of GNUstep, so code in GNUstep shouldn't depend on
> it.
>
> --- Karsten Fuhrmann <karsten_fuhrmann@cartoon-film.de> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> > i am thinking about writing another Subclass of NSBitmapImageRep which
> > will use ImageMagick to handle almost any image format.
> > Is there any concern about this?
> > I want a solution which can be part of the GNUstep source tree!
- more graphic file formats, Karsten Fuhrmann, 2004/12/07
- Re: more graphic file formats, Gregory John Casamento, 2004/12/07
- RE: more graphic file formats,
Vaisburd, Haim <=
- Re: more graphic file formats, Samuel Hornus, 2004/12/08
- RE: more graphic file formats, Vaisburd, Haim, 2004/12/08
- RE: more graphic file formats, Vaisburd, Haim, 2004/12/08