Re: more graphic file formats

[Karsten Fuhrmann]

But if we would use ImageMagick we would have much less deps. than 
before, because all these other image formats are implemented in 
ImageMagick as well. And ImageMagick can  write nearly all the formats 
too.

On 8. Dec 2004, at 3:25 Uhr, Vaisburd, Haim wrote:

> Yes, I also think we should not introduce another
> library dependency. We currenly have TIFF, JPEG, PNG,
> not sure about GIF. I though this was plenty...
> On the other hand, can we _write_ these formats now?
>
> Tima.
>
> --- Gregory John Casamento <greg_casamento@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > My concerns here are:
> > 2) ImageMagick is not part of GNUstep, so code in GNUstep shouldn't 
> > depend on
> > it.
> >
> > --- Karsten Fuhrmann <karsten_fuhrmann@cartoon-film.de> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > > i am thinking about writing another Subclass of NSBitmapImageRep 
> > > which
> > > will use ImageMagick to handle almost any image format.
> > > Is there any concern about this?
> > > I want a solution which can be part of the GNUstep source tree!
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnustep mailing list
> Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
Karsten Fuhrmann
System Administration
Tel. +49 30 698084-109
Fax. +49 30 698084-29
email: karsten_fuhrmann@cartoon-film.de

Cartoon-Film Thilo Graf Rothkirch
Bergmannstr. 68
D-10961 Berlin
Germany