Re: PING: gimplifier ICE fix

[Richard Henderson]

On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 02:57:29PM -0800, Ziemowit Laski wrote:
> Humor me -- how would such a "proof of absence" be constructed?

Show that, for all conforming C or C++ programs, that identical
gimple dumps are obtained with and without the patch in question.

I.e. the patch cannot be shown to remove or alter any casts
required in order for the program to be properly constructed.

I strongly suspect this to be false.


r~