Re: Install gnustep-base standalone

[Sheldon Gill]

Helge Hess wrote:
> Personally I would prefer that gnustep-base evolves into a state so that 
> it can be used for non-GNUstep development (eg no GNUstep.sh, proper 
> integration into Unix/Windows).

Well, now that the pathutilities patch is in the need to source 
GNUstep.sh at startup has gone so I guess its getting closer to what you 
want.

I am curious, though, to know what you mean by "proper integration" into 
Unix and what are the key issues which result in -base not being 
"properly integrated".

> I definitely would like to drop lF once gstep-base is a suitable 
> replacement.

Can you provide the criteria under which -base would be evaluated as 
suitable?


Regards,
Sheldon