[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep Coding Standard Additions
From: |
Wolfgang Sourdeau |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep Coding Standard Additions |
Date: |
Tue, 03 May 2005 18:03:25 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
Hi all,
I know some are not going to love me but here is what I think...
I think that aesthetic is very important in programming. It makes the
code more readable. Bu tI also know it takes a lot of time to ake
everything perfect... Especially with a project with so many lines of
code. So. compared to what is really important, I think the conversion
of existing code so that it matches a consistent programming style
should be put at the last priority.
Besides, I particularly think the "I think you should" attitude leads to
nowhere (or nearly). If you can't code, why not at least write some doc
or modify existing documentation and submit a patch?
Also, on a positive not maybe all of this can be done through a code
parser. It probably would be even take less time to write than to
convert everything by hand.
Wolfgang
- Re: GNUstep Coding Standard Additions, Sheldon Gill, 2005/05/01
- Re: GNUstep Coding Standard Additions, Sheldon Gill, 2005/05/01
- Re: GNUstep Coding Standard Additions, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2005/05/02
- Re: GNUstep Coding Standard Additions, Sheldon Gill, 2005/05/02
- Re: GNUstep Coding Standard Additions,
Wolfgang Sourdeau <=
- Re: GNUstep Coding Standard Additions, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2005/05/05
- Re: GNUstep Coding Standard Additions, Sheldon Gill, 2005/05/05
- Re: GNUstep Coding Standard Additions, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2005/05/05
- Re: GNUstep Coding Standard Additions, David Ayers, 2005/05/05
Re: GNUstep Coding Standard Additions, Alex Perez, 2005/05/04
Re: GNUstep Coding Standard Additions, Sheldon Gill, 2005/05/05
Re: GNUstep Coding Standard Additions, Alex Perez, 2005/05/05