[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Windows problem
From: |
Lloyd Dupont |
Subject: |
Re: Windows problem |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Jun 2005 09:05:17 +1000 |
yeah, right, it absolutely looks something like that!
in fact, when I write an extremely simple sample (for bug submission), I had
a surprise MessageBox telling me: "can't load this (dependency) library"
so I loaded manually a couple of dependency first (iconv, zlib1,..)(even
though they were in the same directory?!?!?!).
but still it didn't work (in the debugger)....
I though what you said, but I am still clueless......
Anyway submitted to MS + MS's newsgroup!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Frith-Macdonald" <richard@brainstorm.co.uk>
To: <discuss-gnustep@gnu.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: Windows problem
On 2005-06-08 07:13:20 +0100 Lloyd Dupont <lloyd@nova-mind.com> wrote:
grmmrrbbll..
now I have a n extremely simple sample which shows that
'gnustep-base.dll' failed to load in the debugger (through LoadLibrary),
while:
1. other library work
2. it succeed on the command line.
Sounds like an environment variable problem ... I would guess (under unix
at least) that the environment variable which tells the system where to
find libraries is not set up the same way when you run in the debugger as
it is when you run from the command line. If this happens, you may fail
to load the base library because some library it uses cannot be found.
The simplest fix for that is to make sure that all the dynamic libraries
used are places in the same (standard) location so that you know they can
be found without having to have their location specified in the
environment variable.
Caveat ... I'm talking about unix here ... things may not be the same
under windows.
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep