[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: quality assurance (was: Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0)
From: |
Adam Fedor |
Subject: |
Re: quality assurance (was: Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0) |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:53:05 -0600 |
On Jul 27, 2005, at 1:04 AM, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
Of course, they would be useful for people to log on to and debug
system specific problems, but in order to screen for problems in the
first place I think, we would need to develop scripts which would run
automatically/periodically to ....
1. retrieve the latest CVS code.
2. build it and run tests on it in various configurations.
3. in the event of a success, log it somewhere so that our website can
display status.
4. in the event of a failure of a build or a test failure in any
configuration, wait a while and try CVS again
5. after some period in which failures are consistent, email out
alerts.
Actually, I already have a script set up to do 1-3 (logs either success
or failure - then it's up to the developers to sees what is wrong).
The logs get posted daily to gnustep-cvs@gnu.org
While I'm at it, I'll reiterate my call for anyone who has a machine
with a few spare cycles to help test GNUstep by running this script.
You need a CVS checkout and the script in CVS:
gnustep/Startup/scripts/test-gnustep
Instuctions included.
You don't need root permission to run the script and you don't need to
tell me - it just works!
- quality assurance (was: Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0), (continued)
- quality assurance (was: Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0), Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2005/07/23
- Re: quality assurance (was: Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0), Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2005/07/23
- Re: quality assurance (was: Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0), Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2005/07/23
- Re: quality assurance (was: Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0), Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2005/07/23
- Re: quality assurance (was: Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0), Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2005/07/24
- Re: quality assurance (was: Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0), Markus Hitter, 2005/07/25
- Re: quality assurance (was: Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0), Alex Perez, 2005/07/26
- Re: quality assurance (was: Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0), Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2005/07/27
- Re: quality assurance (was: Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0),
Adam Fedor <=
Re: quality assurance (was: Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0), Adam Fedor, 2005/07/24
Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0, Benoit, 2005/07/24