|
| From: | Jeremy Tregunna |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration |
| Date: | Fri, 14 Oct 2005 04:46:14 -0400 |
On 13-Oct-05, at 10:18 AM, MJ Ray wrote:
Jeremy Tregunna <jtregunna@blurgle.ca> wrote: [private message posted to a mailing list] First you send me a message off-list without a cc to the list, (but also send a copy to list, unknown to me at that time) then you post my reply to the off-list one here. Dirty sneaky troll.
I had intended to post to the list and not you directly but I hit "Reply" instead of "Reply All" so I just sent the message again; that's hardly dirty or sneaky, but anyway.
The drawbacks of SVN remain: * non-distributed (same as CVS) * incompatible with the git-using tools (same as CVS) * poor library licence limits integration * client at least fivefold more disk, probably bigger in memory too * not supported at savannah * reconfigure everything now, only to move again soon ..and that's all obvious before use. Once in use, other quirks and limitations become obvious. Can't we do better?
You don't seem to understand (even though I've previously mentioned this) -- I. Am. Not. Championing. For. Change. Please. Read. What. I. Wrote. Before.
-- Jeremy Tregunna jtregunna@blurgle.ca"If debugging is the process of removing bugs, then programming must be the process of putting them in." --Dykstra
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |