Re: reincarnating nextstep

[Rogelio M. Serrano Jr.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2005-11-18 21:36:13 +0800 Markus Hitter <mah@jump-ing.de> wrote:

> Am 18.11.2005 um 09:30 schrieb Chris B. Vetter:
>
> > I guess this is more of a general question, but why not focus on a
> > more 'original' clone and base it on Darwin?
>
> Because there's no Darwin release?
>
> There's Darwin 7.2.1, over a year old and not supporting current 
> Apple 
> hardware. Selected hardware on i386, only.
>
> There's Darwin 8.0.1, not rebuildable from public sources and 
> requiring SSE2 
> extensions on i386. Additionaly, it's known to be  neither stable nor 
> reliable.
>
> That said, there's an upcoming Darwin 8.x release expected. After 
> months of 
> work, the small Darwin community finally seems to manage a  rebuild 
> from 
> sources Apple released as "open".
>
>
> Markus
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> Dipl. Ing. Markus Hitter
> http://www.jump-ing.de/

Does anybody know the difference between darwin/xnu and mach3 or
mach4? Im very tempted to take another crack at mach4.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using the GPG bundle for GNUMail

iD8DBQFDfes8yihxuQOYt8wRAo62AJ0aZPr+Xw8WBNylovIFkAiHoPC3PACfXsrw
e/71J9etWKqSrR4FdWFDb78=
=nXUX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----