discuss-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: little ObjectiveC poll.


From: Lloyd Dupont
Subject: Re: little ObjectiveC poll.
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 15:56:12 +1000

Thanks again Sheldon!
Everything seems to confirm my assumptions!

Regards,
Lloyd Dupont

NovaMind development team
NovaMind Software
Mind Mapping Software
<www.nova-mind.com>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Sheldon Gill" <sheldon@westnet.net.au>
To: "Lloyd Dupont" <lloyd@nova-mind.com>
Cc: "GNUstep Discussion" <discuss-gnustep@gnu.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: little ObjectiveC poll.


Lloyd Dupont wrote:
I haven't really programmed in ObjectiveC since a long time now.
But I have to work with my boss's source, developed on MacOSX all in ObjectiveC.

Something puzzles me and I wonder if it's normal in "ObjectiveC" (or C)..... (or if I'mjust unlucky ;-) His files are very long (most of them over a few 10 of thousands lines) and some methods are very long too (up to 1 to 2 or 3 thousands line. 1 thousands line is common, 3 is rare). Now I wonder, is it "common practice" in ObjectiveC, or is it just my boss?

I don't think its common practice in most programming languages.

One of the metrics used for program maintainability is length per function. Higher length, less maintainable.

Take a look at the whole refactoring movement and most "good programming practice" information out there. You'll see that shorter is generally better and preferred.


Regards,
Sheldon





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]