|
From: | Sheldon Gill |
Subject: | Re: Windows and GnuStep |
Date: | Sat, 04 Feb 2006 17:51:44 +0800 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) |
Jason Clouse wrote:
On 2006-02-03 15:57:28 -0500 Richard Frith-Macdonald <richard@brainstorm.co.uk> wrote:I agree ... it's sad and it's not how I would have read it, but it seems it needs clarification.Perhaps it's worth saying that while it's perfectly possible to write applications which are portable to windows, at least 90% of applications have been written solely for portability across unix platforms.Also, you can't build your application on a Mac, copy the source to a Linux box, and simply type "make". Which is probably what a lot of Mac devs are thinking when they think of portability. A lot of people seem to use the Core* frameworks and mixtures of Cocoa and Carbon.
This is very true. Quite understandable once you realise the number of things you *can't* do in Cocoa and so *have* to fall back to Carbon.
Regards, Sheldon
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |