[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: really attracting developers
Re: really attracting developers
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 20:47:12 +0200
Am 25.08.2006 um 16:25 schrieb Andreas Wagner:
ATM, there is a small community project forming around developers
dissatisfied with Apple's dilution of OpenStep and Unix principles.
Well, if they are dissatisfied with Apple's principles, why they are
planning to clone Mac OS X, then? Changes between OpenStep and Mac OS
X are in big parts the stuff they dislike: Carbon, to name the
The project is merely in the process of forming and many things are
not decided yet.
A good idea would be to get rid of the fixation to Ubuntu. Sure,
Ubuntu is a great thing, but it is a full OS with more than one full
GUI and developer environments already. To stay within the heritage
of OpenStep, they'd have to get rid of all this (then) unneccessary
E.g. I don't fully understand the goals that are to be pursued and
where or why they seem to differ from GNUstep.
Rick obviously wants GNUstep and even more. If he wants to get
anywhere this century (and I mean the 21st one), he could start with
a Mac OS X compatibility layer for GNUstep. Whatever the contents of
this layer would be.
BTW., with the renaming issue he's plain wrong. GNUstep has a lot of
"GS" named classes, but they are additions over OpenStep (and Cocoa).
The "NS" named classes are all (regarding OpenStep) there, are
expected to be used primarily and are expected to work the way they
worked on OpenStep.
Another thing that has been discussed is working towards an Ubuntu-
based distribution with a full-blown (or maximum-blown) OpenStep
environment set up
Like Gürkan Sengün already did with the GNUstep Live CD? This CD
works great and if you happen to own a computer with 128 MB RAM,
you'll notice the advantage of GNUstep Live over Ubuntu with Gnome
almost immediately: it works without minutes of swapping delays.
Anyway, I am quite certain that there are rather competent and
commited developers there.
It's a pity they didn't show up here on GNUstep already. I'm sure
they'd be welcome to start projects dependant on GNUstep and nobody
would stop them if they'd decide to get independant one day.
[...] the issue here is attracting apple developers.
Without cloning the entire Mac OS X, you'll never be able to compile
Cocoa apps unchanged right on any other system. With some care taken
however, it works today already. You can compile GNUstep apps with
different levels of nativeness, use Apple's Interface Builder, and so
on ... GNUmail is a good example: Native on the Mac, native elsewhere.
- In the same vein, how much are the apps dependent upon (how much
of a) GNUstep/OpenStep system when they are executed.
Full to not at all, dependent on how statically you link and what
*Step specials you use (e.g. Pasteboard, Distributed Objects).
- no distribution with its package management system backing GNUstep
Many package managers have hooked in GNUstep already and it's not
particularly difficult to put it into even more. GNUstep is more or
less a "./configure; make; make install" thing. Many times due to
many dependencies. Once you've set up the dependencies and know the
parameters for your platform, it works until you step over your beard.
- the outfit that is comparable to what everyone's more used to
That's true, IMHO, and we're discussing it right now.
- Fears of RMS-ization.
Even Apple and Ubuntu it's self can live with this. They all use
bash, gcc, and this other stuff.
Finally, coming to know GNUstep, I myself am tempted to learn
The last of these even comes with a nice video, showing and
commenting you each click needed.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dipl. Ing. Markus Hitter