|Subject:||Re: Thoughts triggered by these NeXTbuntu guys|
|Date:||Wed, 30 Aug 2006 12:10:15 +0200|
Then if we get a person who is able to contribute there is another thingthat I consider the second most important problem - the copyright assignment to FSF.
Amen to that.
This I'm not so sure about. For a large project, requiring code to be copyright assigned to a neutral third party (or if run by committee, that group) can save you from cases where someone might get all pissy and decide they want to revoke distribution privileges for all their code they've contributed, setting the project back potentially many months. If you don't want to assign copyright, you don't have to -- you can maintain a separate patchset outside of GNUstep. But please, don't confuse assigning copyright to the FSF as not getting credit. All you have to do is look through the GNUstep source code, and you'll see "written by..." even if the module has been rewritten, you'll usually see a "original implementation by ..."; credit is given.This topic deserves another message with a different subject line,here I can only say that it presents a natural obstacle for people who,like me, wants their work to be recognized by others. Thus the Nextbuntu's idea on removing this requirement seems to me quite appealing.
There are people out there who WANT to contribute to GNUstep directly (like adding missing classes) and do NOT want to offer a separate patchset (because it may not make much sense) and do NOT want to sign the copyright thingy, not because they fear not getting credit but simply because they do not want to SIGN anything.
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|