|
From: | Adrian Robert |
Subject: | Re: really attracting developers |
Date: | Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:58:27 -0400 |
On Aug 30, 2006, at 1:44 PM, Michael Thaler wrote:
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 14:41, discuss-gnustep-request@gnu.org wrote:True, especially regarding Gecko. However, using libwww WOULD be an idea for writing a _very_ simple webbrowser. I was thinking aboutthat, using libwww as a bundle, so it could be easily replaced in caseWebKit (or something else that's better than libwww) came along.What is a _very_ simple webbrowser good for? I don't think many peope are interested in using such a browser if there are far better alternatives likeFirefox and Konqueror.
It could be useful in embedded contexts -- e.g., a class documentation viewer for ProjectCenter, HTML email viewing in GNUMail, application help, etc..
If libwww is something relatively lean and mean, so much the better.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |